OF COURSE YOU RECOGNIZE HIM...



Tête de Clown - 1955
In my last chapter on Magritte, I told you that he was so identifiable that his work could not be stolen. In fact a picture had been stolen but was returned to the museum some three years later as it couldn’t be sold. 

I feel this is the same with Bernard Buffet. Once again, we all know his work - probably you have come across his clown






or his owl


Le Petit Duc -1969







or even a self portrait. 

You certainly don’t have to be an art genius or historian to know the picture is a Bernard Buffet.



Self Portrait -1966


Never the less, I don’t think that I have ever seen a retrospective of his work before.

He was born in 1928 and took his life in 1999. He had Parkinson’s and could no longer hold a brush. Buffet is considered to be one of the most famous French painters of the 20th Century but he is also one of the most contentious.

There are so many descriptions of his work. Let’s look at a few

« Only the works from his early period are any good »

I only discovered a couple of his early paintings - but even then his style is recognizable.

L'Atelier - 1947

Fleur sur une Chaise (for Mummy) -1947

Man with a fried egg - 1947

The Dead Fowl - 1947

















« He’s a commercial painter » - Well he did become a millionaire but I don’t think he had so many admirers as could be imagined.

« His paintings are all painted in the same way »…here I agree and I think that this is what makes him so recognizable. His self portraits over the years are all painted in the same position - looking at his easel and there is only one in my book which stands out from the rest.

Self Portrait - 1949

Self Portrait - 1955

Self portrait (?)

Self Portrait - 1956

Self Portrait - 1977 (I wonder if he has such a beard?)

And yes, he was extremely popular with the public in his early years. As long as his painting seemed to express anxieties of a generation that had come through the war, he was hailed as a genius. Success allowed him to paint what he wanted to. His style is disconcerting and harshly aggressive. 

The exhibition was another block-buster. In all over 100 paintings.



Self Portrait - 1953

Le Sommeil d'Après Courbet - 1955
I don’t think that I have ever seen work which is so visually « sad ». NO-one ever smiles and even the clowns and circus entertainers seem to look at you with mournful faces.


Trapéziestes - The Circus - 1955


Clown with Trombone - 1955

Acrobats 1955

Clowns, Magicians, and Singer -1991

Clowns, Musicians Harpist - 1991








Two Men in a Room - 1947

Holidays in the Vaucluse - 1950


There is a lot of work too where we see nude men - there were many more, but...






Nude male in a room - 1948













                                                                  or women - no beauty in my book, in fact the men looked starved and the women were old. I just hope my body doesn'tlook as withered as these.



Three Nudes (La Toilette) - 1949

The Large Nude - 1979

Three women - 1963

The suddenly there is a trio which breaks away from his recognizable style…


Undressed - 1966

His animals were not much happier either...

The Dead Rooster

Still life - skinned rabbit - 149

Bul frog on a water lily - 1956

Two Rays - 1963

The Ram - 1960

???

Fish Skeleton - 1963


My Monkeys - Gorilla - 1997

My Monkeys -Female - 1997


Some of the themes can be related to paintings we all know…


The Absinth Drinker (Degas -1893)

The drinker - 1948


 Gustave Courbet "The Origin of the World" (1886)

Red Bird - 1959

The Owl - 1959

Birds - "Birth" of a day - 1959


 Or other themes, religious or otherwise which still seem to be so triste...
Lapidation - 1948


Darning the nets - 1948

Les Folles - The Bride - 1970

Les Folles - Couple with a Skull - 1970

Skinned head - 1964

Skinned head - 1964

Beach - The sun-umbrella - 1967

20 thousand leagues under the sea - the Giant Pulp - 1989

20 thousand leagues under the sea - the giant Nautilus porthole - 1989

 One theme that did reconcile me with his work was the still life which I am usually not keen about at all. Or a couple of his landscapes. Basically because they were minimalist or the objects really had nothing to do with the setting. He seems to be obsessed with Ray or Sole...but why, I didn't find out...

Stii Life - revolver - 1949

Galerie Visconti - 1954

Still Life with a sole - 1952

Nanse - 1951

Nanse - 1955

Saint Céneri Chapel - 1976

Saint Maclou Church - Pontoise - 1976

The Blue Coffee Pot - 1956

Still Life with Ray - 1956

Pierre Bergé was Buffet's live-in lover until Bergé left Buffet for Yves Saint Laurent. (1951-56). Bergé was younger than Buffet (and my goodness he was handsome). The English say that Bergé left him for Yves Saint Laurent and the French say it the other way around. Does it matter?


Pierre Bergé - 1950

Isabel with plait - 1960
Bergé certainly managed him and his work. There was a video I watched and Buffet came through as a very timid man…so why such bleakness in his painting?

He then fell head over heals in love with Annabel.


In December 1958, he married Annabel, who was a writer  and actress. His daughter Virginie was born in 1962, and later, daughter Danielle in 1963. His son Nicolas, was born in 1973, the same year that he was named "Chevalier de la Légion d’honneur ».


One painting which really caught my attention was « Kabuki Ren Jishi » done in 1987. He was very attracted to Japan and in fact had a museum there dedicated to his work.



Kabuki Ren Jishi - 1987 (My favorite)

Despite his wealth, fast cars, bi-sexuality - and the rest, he never seemed to be a happy man if one takes his paintings into account.
These were a couple of his last paintings…macabre



Death

Death 7 - 1999
It's a rather sad way to end 2016. For all those who follow me and take time off to read my Blog, thank you and may 2017 be full of joy and good health for us all, not to mention the many exhibitions I hope to see.

Commentaires

Posts les plus consultés de ce blog

CONFLICTS AND ENCOUNTERS OF MULTIPLE HISTORIES

MY BELOVED PICASSO -I WAS LOOKING FORWARD TO THIS -

THE CHOICE OF ONE OF THE RICHEST WOMEN IN THE WORLD